Tesla, GM and Nissan advocate for extending the federal EV tax credit

The federal EV tax credit is something of a blunt instrument, but there’s little doubt that it has encouraged a substantial number of EV purchases. The future of the $7,500 tax credit is uncertain. Recently, one Republican senator introduced a bill to expand the credit, and another introduced a bill to get rid of it and replace it with a tax on EVs.

Last year, Congress rejected a previous attempt to eliminate the credit, so it’s pretty clear that legislators on both sides of the aisle support the tax credit, and EVs in general. Now that the Democrats have regained control of the House, the time could be ripe to reform and improve the program.

The existing tax credit has several problems. For one thing, it benefits only higher-income taxpayers, who arguably don’t need it. For another, because it was designed to be phased out for individual automakers after they reach a threshold of 200,000 plug-in vehicle sales, it now has the perverse effect of penalizing companies that took risks and got into the EV market earlier, and rewarding those who sat on the fence and waited to introduce their own plug-in vehicles.

The three automakers belonging to the former group, Tesla, Nissan and GM, have formed a coalition, together with several other EV-related organizations, including ABB, ChargePoint, Plug In America and Proterra, which advocates eliminating the sales cap and allowing all automakers to compete on a more equal basis.

“The original electric vehicle tax credit, which goes directly to consumers, not manufacturers, catalyzed the market, increased consumer awareness and grew a nascent industry,” reads the manifesto of the newly formed EV Drive Coalition. “To promote continued market growth and stabilization, members of the EV Drive Coalition are advocating for reform to lift the current cap on the number of consumers who can take advantage of the credit through each manufacturer.”

“Arbitrary constraints with the federal credit limit consumer options and make it harder for consumers to purchase the cars they want,” says Joel Levin, Executive Director of Plug In America. “Lifting the cap would create a more level playing field for all manufacturers, giving consumers the freedom to decide which car they want in a free and fair market.”

“We feel that the tax credit should be modified so all customers continue to receive the full benefit going forward,” said Dan Turton, VP of Public Policy at GM.

“We’ve been able to make tremendous strides in the underlying technology of electric vehicles,” said coalition spokesperson Trevor Francis. “The battery power and the range have improved significantly over the last few years. With every new advance, we get closer to becoming an economically sustainable market. However, we’re not there yet, and keeping the cap will have a negative impact on a sustainable US electric vehicle market. As it stands now, electric vehicles are responsible for nearly 300,000 jobs. This is a jobs issue and an economic issue in addition to a consumer issue.”

 

Source: EV Drive Coalition via Electrek

  • mipak

    It should be modified by rolling over ALL the incentives they give to fossil fuels which is $24 billion a year and give an equal amount to the EV industry. EV subsidies currently amount to a little over $2.5 billion a year. And then it should be doubled and tripled over the next two decades to force everyone to buy electric. For the good of the planet.

    • Broncobet

      No,EV’s are better, they do not need subsidies, that is myth by the fossil fuel lobby.

  • Brad Couch

    RNG is cleaner and more cost effective for GHG emissions reductions than EVs. Period. That is what the science says and its verified by CARB. RNG burning NGVs should be an equal or higher focus of incentives. But I doubt it is likely for incentives to increase. Regardless NGVs should have parity with EV’s! There are 26 million NGVs on the world wide roadways yet less than 1/4 million in North America. The federal love affair with EVs is the cause and needs to end!